Back to Home
Comparison
2 vehicles
MG HS I EHS 1.5 T-GDI
2024 • SUV
Adult Occupant
92%
Child Occupant
83%
Pedestrian
74%
Safety Assist
78%
5/5
Euro NCAP
2022
MG HS II 1.5T
2025 • SUV
Adult Occupant
92%
Child Occupant
83%
Pedestrian
74%
Safety Assist
78%
5/5
Euro NCAP
2022
Detailed Comparison
Specification
MG
HS I EHS 1.5 T-GDI
MG
HS II 1.5T
Electric Range
52 km
120 km
Best Value
Fuel Consumption
1.8 L/100km
0.5 L/100km
Best Value
Battery Capacity
14.9 kWh
23.2 kWh
Best Value
Power
258 HP
299 HP
Best Value
Engine Displacement
1.49 L
1.5 L
CO₂ Emissions
43 g/km
12 g/km
Best Value
AC Charge Time
3.5h
Best Value
4h
DC Charge Time
—
Best Value
—
Best Value
Trunk Volume
463 L
507 L
Best Value
Seats
5
5
Warranty
7 years
Best Value
3 years
Euro NCAP Rating
5/5
Best Value
5/5
Electric Range
MG HS I EHS 1.5 T-GDI
52 km
MG HS II 1.5T
120 km
Best Value
Fuel Consumption
MG HS I EHS 1.5 T-GDI
1.8 L/100km
MG HS II 1.5T
0.5 L/100km
Best Value
Battery Capacity
MG HS I EHS 1.5 T-GDI
14.9 kWh
MG HS II 1.5T
23.2 kWh
Best Value
Power
MG HS I EHS 1.5 T-GDI
258 HP
MG HS II 1.5T
299 HP
Best Value
Engine Displacement
MG HS I EHS 1.5 T-GDI
1.49 L
MG HS II 1.5T
1.5 L
CO₂ Emissions
MG HS I EHS 1.5 T-GDI
43 g/km
MG HS II 1.5T
12 g/km
Best Value
AC Charge Time
MG HS I EHS 1.5 T-GDI
3.5h
Best Value
MG HS II 1.5T
4h
DC Charge Time
MG HS I EHS 1.5 T-GDI
—
Best Value
MG HS II 1.5T
—
Best Value
Trunk Volume
MG HS I EHS 1.5 T-GDI
463 L
MG HS II 1.5T
507 L
Best Value
Seats
MG HS I EHS 1.5 T-GDI
5
MG HS II 1.5T
5
Warranty
MG HS I EHS 1.5 T-GDI
7 years
Best Value
MG HS II 1.5T
3 years
Euro NCAP Rating
MG HS I EHS 1.5 T-GDI
5/5
Best Value
MG HS II 1.5T
5/5
🗺️EUROPEAN REAL-WORLD ROUTE BENCHMARKS
Germany 🇩🇪 & France 🇫🇷 Popular Routes Comparison
Visual side-by-side simulation across flat highway corridors and hilly Alpine passes—showing exact ICE transition kilometer, downhill regenerative recovery, and total trip energy cost.
Select Benchmark Route (Flat & Hilly):
🇩🇪
Munich → Garmisch-Partenkirchen
A95 / B2 • Bavyera AlpleriClassic Bavarian Alps benchmark climbing from Munich (520m) over the 885m Eschenlohe crest before descending into Garmisch (708m). Tests uphill battery load, weight penalty, and downhill regen recovery.
Distance
90 km
Highway Pace
110 km/h
Ascent / Descent
+500m / -312m
Local Tariffs (DE)
⚡0.36€ • ⛽1.78€
⚡ #1
MG HS I EHS 1.5 T-GDI
🔋 12.5 kWh net (52 km WLTP)NMC🔥 PTC Heater
Open in Simulator💶 -0.07 € lower trip cost
Route Drive Mode Split (EV vs HEV)⚡→⛽ Petrol Engine Start:Km 40.7(Alt: 607m)
49% EV
51% HEV
Pure Electric (EV):44 km
Hybrid / Petrol (HEV):46 km
Electricity Used
10 kWh
22.7 kWh/100km
♻️Downhill Regen Bonus
+0 kWh
~+0 km EV bonus
Petrol Consumed
2.3 L
2.6 L/100km
💶Total Trip Energy Cost
7.69 €
⚡3.60€ + ⛽4.09€
🟣 #2
MG HS II 1.5T
🔋 19.5 kWh net (120 km WLTP)NMC🔥 PTC Heater
Open in Simulator+17.9 km more pure EV driving
Route Drive Mode Split (EV vs HEV)⚡→⛽ Petrol Engine Start:Km 58.5(Alt: 748m)
69% EV
31% HEV
Pure Electric (EV):61.9 km
Hybrid / Petrol (HEV):28.1 km
Electricity Used
15.6 kWh
25.2 kWh/100km
♻️Downhill Regen Bonus
+0.1 kWh
~+0.5 km EV bonus
Petrol Consumed
1.2 L
1.3 L/100km
💶Total Trip Energy Cost
7.76 €
⚡5.62€ + ⛽2.14€
⛰️Route Elevation Profile & Terrain Slope Telemetry
Altitude gains/descents, gravity potential energy, and regenerative battery recovery along the journey.
🎯MG HS I EHS 1.5 T-GDIEV: 0–40.7 km (%20)HEV: 40.7–71.3 km♻️⚡Regen EV: Km 71.3+ (+3.3 km)Descent (Regenerative Charging)Climb (High Power Draw)
Total Ascent
+500 m
Max Incline: %4.2
Total Descent
-312 m
End Elevation: 708 m
🏔️Peak Elevation
885 m
@ Km 68
Regenerated Energy
+0 kWh⚡ Max +0.7 kW
~+0 km EV bonus⚡ Full Regen
Terrain Net Impact
+1.9 kWh
Ekstra yerçekimi tüketimi
🌦️
Dynamic Route Weather & Microclimate CorridorΔT 2.4°C
HVAC draw, air density (ρ), and BMS cold regen limits adapt dynamically to altitude and microclimate at every kilometer.
Munich🌡️ 16°C⛰️ 520m
→Summit (Km 68)🌡️ 13.6°C⛰️ 885m
→Garmisch-Partenkirchen🌡️ 14.8°C⛰️ 708m
👁️1-Click Show / Hide:
Open Route in Full Interactive Map Simulator
Explore live map polylines, custom speeds, and full telemetry
Strengths
Specs & verified owner feedback
MG HS I EHS 1.5 T-GDI4 highlights
Specification Strengths: AC Charge Time, DC Charge Time, Warranty, Euro NCAP Rating
Owner Forum & Test Highlights
- ✓Massive 21.4 kWh battery delivering 120 km WLTP electric range for pure EV daily commuting
- ✓Punchy 1.5 Turbo engine with 2-speed DHT providing 272–307 HP responsive acceleration
- ✓Established European dealer network, central parts logistics, and 7-year / 150,000 km warranty
MG HS II 1.5T7 highlights
Specification Strengths: Electric Range, Fuel Consumption, Battery Capacity, Power, CO₂ Emissions, DC Charge Time, Trunk Volume
Owner Forum & Test Highlights
- ✓Massive 21.4 kWh battery delivering 120 km WLTP electric range for pure EV daily commuting
- ✓Punchy 1.5 Turbo engine with 2-speed DHT providing 272–307 HP responsive acceleration
- ✓Established European dealer network, central parts logistics, and 7-year / 150,000 km warranty
Weaknesses
Trade-offs & chronic forum issues
MG HS I EHS 1.5 T-GDI6 drawbacks
Specification Drawbacks: Electric Range, Fuel Consumption, Battery Capacity, Power, CO₂ Emissions, Trunk Volume
Owner Complaints & Chronic Notes
- ⚠NMC battery chemistry requires a disciplined 20%-80% charging routine for longevity
- ⚠No DC fast charging capability (limited to 7 kW AC charging)
- ⚠Moderate body roll in spirited cornering with light steering feedback
MG HS II 1.5T3 drawbacks
Specification Drawbacks: AC Charge Time, Warranty, Euro NCAP Rating
Owner Complaints & Chronic Notes
- ⚠NMC battery chemistry requires a disciplined 20%-80% charging routine for longevity
- ⚠No DC fast charging capability (limited to 7 kW AC charging)
- ⚠Moderate body roll in spirited cornering with light steering feedback
PHEV Intelligence Verdict
Community & Road Test Verdict: Which One Should You Buy?
Real-world buying guidance based on owner forum telemetry, long-term feedback, and ownership costs.
Value & Urban Efficiency Champion
MG HS I EHS 1.5 T-GDI
Ideal Use Case: Daily urban commuting, standard luxury features, and maximum value-for-money.
- ✓Feature-loaded standard specification (ventilated seats, 360 camera) and supreme equipment-per-euro ratio.
Value & Urban Efficiency Champion
MG HS II 1.5T
Ideal Use Case: Daily urban commuting, standard luxury features, and maximum value-for-money.
- ✓Maximized electric-only daily driving with generous usable battery capacity.
- ✓Feature-loaded standard specification (ventilated seats, 360 camera) and supreme equipment-per-euro ratio.
⚡
Bottom Line: If your priority is urban commuting with zero fuel burn and maximum luxury toys, the newer high-capacity PHEV excels; for frequent cross-country motorway tours and worry-free secondary market resale, established European chassis maturity takes the win.
Video Comparison & Test Drive
Jaecoo J7 vs MG HS (2026) | Test hybryd PHEV: Który chiński SUV jest lepszy?
Channel: Caroseria
Porównanie dwóch najpopularniejszych chińskich SUV-ów hybrydowych typu plug-in w Polsce i Europie: Jaecoo J7 SHS oraz nowego MG HS (2026). Test realnego zasięgu elektrycznego, zużycia paliwa, ładowania i dynamiki jazdy.
Best Value
Highlighted cells indicate the best value in each category. Lower values are better for consumption and emissions. Higher values are better for range, power, and capacity.