Chery vs MG: Chery Tiggo 7 Pro PHEV vs New-Gen MG HS II (1.5T) Direct Comparison

The rivalry between Chinese automakers in Europe is reaching new heights. Both Chery and SAIC's MG are making waves in the popular 1.5-litre plug-in hybrid SUV segment.

Comparing the New-Gen MG HS II 1.5T PHEV with the Chery Tiggo 7 Pro PHEV reveals two fundamentally different engineering philosophies beneath their bonnets.

Quick Take

• MG HS II: Boasts a massive 24.7 kWh battery delivering 120 km (WLTP) of pure electric driving and a punchy 299 hp. However, it LACKS DC FAST CHARGING.
• Chery Tiggo 7 Pro PHEV: Features a more compact 18.3 kWh LFP pack with 90 km (WLTP) range, but counters with a game-changing 40 kW DC fast-charging port.

1. Electric Range: Real-World Expectations

• MG HS II (21.4 kWh usable):

  • WLTP Claim: 120 km
  • Real City Range: Expect 90 to 105 km in mild weather, and ~75-80 km in winter.
  • Commuters travelling up to 80 km daily can easily complete their commute without firing the petrol engine.

• Chery Tiggo 7 Pro (16.5 kWh usable):

  • WLTP Claim: 90 km
  • Real City Range: Yields 65 to 75 km in mixed urban driving, dropping to ~50-55 km in winter.
  • Perfect for standard 40-50 km daily commutes.

Range Verdict: With a pack roughly 5 kWh larger, the MG HS II delivers 25–30 km more real-world range than the Chery.

2. Charging Speed: The Decisive Difference

Chery Tiggo 7 Pro: 40 kW DC Fast Charging

• Equipped with a CCS2 port supporting 40 kW DC fast charging, allowing a 30% to 80% top-up in just 20–25 minutes at highway rest stops.
• AC charging supports 6.6 kW, achieving a full charge from a home wallbox in approximately 2.5 hours.

MG HS II: Big Battery, Slow Charging Limitation

• The MG HS II does NOT support DC fast charging.
• Furthermore, its onboard AC charger is limited to 3.6 kW (16A single-phase).
• Refilling its large 24.7 kWh battery from empty takes 6 to 7 hours. This car is built exclusively for overnight home charging.

Charging Verdict: Chery Tiggo 7 Pro wins hands down for public charging convenience and flexibility.

3. Powertrain & Driving Performance

• MG HS II: Combines a 1.5T engine (142 hp) with an exceptionally potent 154 kW (209 hp) electric motor for a total of 299 hp and a 0-100 km/h sprint of 6.8 seconds. Immediate torque makes it feel remarkably swift.
• Chery Tiggo 7 Pro: Produces ~240 hp using a 1.5T engine, dual electric motors, and a 3-speed dedicated hybrid transmission (3DHT). 0-100 km/h arrives in 7.9 seconds—plenty quick, but smoother and less aggressive than the MG.

4. Empty-Battery Fuel Consumption

• Chery Tiggo 7 Pro: Consumes 6.8 – 7.6 L/100 km at motorway speeds (120 km/h) with a depleted battery.
• MG HS II: Its heavier kerb weight (1,863 kg) results in 7.0 – 7.9 L/100 km at 120 km/h.

5. Technical Comparison Table

The Verdict: Which One Should You Buy?

• Choose the MG HS II if: You have a dedicated home driveway/garage charger, commute 70-100 km daily, and want near-sports-car 300 hp acceleration with generous rear legroom.
• Choose the Chery Tiggo 7 Pro if: You rely on public charging infrastructure, want rapid 20-minute DC top-ups, and prefer rich infotainment tech in a slightly more compact urban SUV.